What is the relationship between non-conformity and self-actualization?
Highlights from our meeting on 05/21/03
- Can you be self-actualizing if you are a conformist?
- What does it mean to be a conformist?
- Doesn't it mean that you do what everyone else does?
- What does self-actualizing mean?
- Doesn't that mean becoming your unique self?
- Is your unique self something you were born with?
- Is a self-actualized person, someone who has manifested his unique self?
- Does that mean that a self-actualized person has reached his end state of being?
- Can animals be self-actualizing?
- Aren't animals already at their end state of being?
- Does that mean that animals are already self-actualized?
- Doesn't self-actualizing mean more that just reaching the limit of your conscious development?
- Can't it be said that there are 4 stages in man's conscious development?
- Aren't these stages characterized by the perspectives of (a) things happen to me, (b) things happen by me, (c) things happen through me, and (d) things happen as me?
- Does self-actualized then mean having reached the stage where "things happen as me"?
- What is the difference between self-actualized and enlightened?
- Doesn't self-actualized imply maximizing your own unique and separate self, or "being all you can be"?
- Doesn't enlightenment imply transcending the ego or separate self so that one is no longer operating as a separate self?
- Are either of these end-points achievable?
- Isn't there always further to go?
- Isn't enlightenment and self-actualization, like development, a process rather than an end-point?
- So does that mean one can be self-actualizing, without being self-actualized?
- Is one always self-actualizing, or is this a process which only starts after more basic processes have finished?
- Would one of the more basic processes be the process of conforming?
- Does conforming meet a basic need for having a feeling of belonging?
- Can one belong to a community or subculture without conforming?
- Can a rebel be a conformist?
- Is a rebel, who is in a subculture of rebels, a conformist or non-conformist?
- What role does motive play in being a conformist?
- By conformist, don't we mean someone who intentionally adjusts his behavior to be like everyone else?
- Isn't intent the distinguishing component?
- So if one acts like everyone else by accident, does that mean he is not a conformist?
- Who is everyone else?
- Can't a conformist in one setting be a non-conformist in another?
- Couldn't a Buddhist be a non-conformist in the general population and a conformist in a Buddhist monastery?
- If the Buddhist's motivation is not driven by the desire to be the same, but rather by higher aspirations, isn't he still a non-conformist even in the monastery?
- Isn't it true that we can be conformists in some ways while simultaneously being non-conformists in other ways?
- Doesn't being a conformist beg the question, conforming to what?
- Couldn't one intentionally conform to some standards or conventions, such as traffic laws, while not conforming to others, such as fashion trends?
- Couldn't one also conform or not conform to values of one's parents or even your own past values?
- Isn't some conformity necessary to solve problems on a group or community level?
- Isn't that what moral codes represent?
- What about problems where the good of the individual conflicts with the good of the group?
- Doesn't over-fishing hurt all fisherman collectively, while individual restraint hurts the individual fisherman?
- Can't a higher authority, such as the federal government, impose conformity to solve such a problem?
- But what if there is no higher authority?
- Isn't the European Union an attempt to create a higher authority to conform to in order to solve problems that are not solvable by individual countries acting by themselves?
- Isn't that also what the individual states did in this country to form the United States?
- Isn't that the goal of the United Nations?
- Is some form of conformity, then, a necessary foundation for creating a peaceful community of nations or individuals?
- Is a peaceful community a prerequisite for individual self-actualization?
- Can someone be self-actualizing in a non-free, totalitarian environment?
- How about in a concentration camp?
- Didn't Viktor Frankl write about exactly that in his book, Man's Search For Meaning?
- Wasn't he self-actualizing where the only freedom remaining was the freedom to choose one's attitude?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home