What is the sanctity of life and when, where, and to whom does it apply?
Highlights from our meeting on 06/04/03
- If we think life is sacred, does that mean we shouldn't eat meat?
- Does the sanctity of life apply equally to humans, cows, and carrots?
- How does the sanctity of life apply to decisions about abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia?
- What are the imperatives that come with a belief in the sanctity of life?
- How do we reconcile these imperatives with our gut feelings or emotional attachments?
- What if I like the taste of meat and my gut tells me some meat in my diet is good for me?
- How would I reconcile that with the belief that all creatures have a right to live?
- Isn't our diet largely determined by our culture?
- Don't people in many Asian countries commonly eat all sorts of insects?
- Don't we in this culture commonly eat bee poop?
- What do you mean bee poop?
- Isn't honey actually just bee poop?
- Don't you mean bee vomit?
- Does it really matter?
- Don't we eat honey because it tastes good?
- Doesn't honey taste good because our bodies are programmed to recognize nutritious food as that which tasted good?
- So if meat tastes good, does that mean it is good for us?
- Can we still trust our taste buds in this age of heavily processed foods?
- But isn't meat a natural part of the diet for many creatures besides man?
- Would it be more ethical, more reverent of life, to eat only meat from animals that already died of natural causes?
- Is killing necessarily antithetical to the sanctity of life?
- Aren't many animals, by nature, prey for predators?
- Aren't these animals meant by nature to be hunted, killed, and eaten?
- Isn't the more important question, how and why an animal is killed?
- Can we make the distinction between animals killed swiftly with little pain or suffering for food, and animals bludgeoned to death for fur coats?
- So is "dying well" part of the observance of the sanctity of life?
- Would this also apply to euthanasia and the idea of death with dignity?
- Isn't living well also a critical part of upholding the sanctity of life?
- By "living well" do we mean living in accordance with nature?
- Can we say that free-range cattle and chickens live well compared to those that are tightly confined, even though both are raised to be killed for food?
- How about the issue of "death with dignity"?
- Isn't dying naturally with dignity more consistent with the sanctity of life than remaining alive indefinitely by artificial modern medical technology?
- What about the voluntary ending of a life with modern medical technology to alleviate the suffering of the terminally ill?
- Is euthanasia consistent with the sanctity of life?
- And what about abortion?
- How would we apply this "nature is better" approach to the abortion question?
- Isn't an artificially induced abortion by means of modern medical technology as unnatural an act as there can be?
- Does that mean abortions violate the sanctity of life?
- Don't most women, by nature, prefer not to have abortions because of strong maternal instincts?
- Isn't it also true that the vast majority of abortions are performed by Mother Nature herself?
- Is there such a thing as a reverent, humane, and natural way for man to perform abortions?
- Is the imperative of the sanctity of life, then, related more to attitude and quality than to simple end result?
- Isn't the how and why more important than the what?
- Isn't the question of whether or when to kill or not to kill a separate moral question from how it is done?
- Whether or not we kill, isn't it imperative that we handle both life and death with the greatest of reverence and care?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home